Landscape or Portrait?

A rarity in my pictures - cropped to square. J15 class 0-6-0 no. 65462 at Bolton Abbey, Embsay & Bolton Abbey Steam Railway, 25 November 2005
Last time I was out shooting with a bunch of mates, the mickey taking started again. They have a theory my camera only works when it’s on end shooting ‘portrait’ or vertical format pictures. So that set me thinking, why?
Before going into figures, let’s get our terms straight. ‘Landscape’ pictures are horizontal, ‘Portrait’ are vertical. And then of course there’s square, but that one’s obvious. For the purposes of this blog post, I’ll use vertical and horizontal. That’s because we’ll be talking about landscape as subject matter, so let’s not confuse ourselves!
I started out checking the facts. Looking at the pictures I regard as ‘good’ - the overall figures are 56% vertical and 44% horizontal. That pretty much holds for railway shots - 54% vertical and 46% horizontal. For landscape shots the figures become 61% vertical and 39% horizontal. And for people shots the figures are 59% vertical, 36% horizontal and (at last!) 5% square.
So the mickey taking was right, my camera does churn out more vertical pictures than horizontal pictures, and that’s especially true of landscape shots.
When you think landscape shots, that sort of makes sense. A good foregound is a great lead in to a picture, though it can be a challenge from a depth of field perspective. But then many, if not most landscape shots are from the stability of a tripod, so a small aperture is no big deal.
When you think people shots it also makes sense. People (at least the majority!) are taller than they are wider, so a vertical format makes perfect sense. Even when you start taking bits of people, the same holds true. Not many people have a face as wide as it is tall! Of course some people have two faces, but that’s a different discussion…
It’s railway shots where the choice of vertical format isn’t so obvious. So why? Interestingly, if you further break it down - diesel and electric traction seems to favour a horizontal approach, whilst steam favours a vertical approach.
With that subdivision, the choice becomes obvious. Steam engines by definition have smoke and steam coming out of the top of them. And that smoke and steam is generally what the picture’s about. And that’s why my favourite steam railway pictures are mostly vertical format.
The vertical approach also enables some of the landscape photography style to come into play. As trains run on tracks, the vertical approach instantly gives a strong lead in line to the subject in the form of the rails themselves. And yes I’m sad enough to try to get the rails leading into one of the bottom corners of the picture. It’s sort of tidy!
So, that’s my logic. It’s also worth chucking into the thinking that composition theory suggests vertical pictures are more dynamic, whilst horizontal pictures are more restful. Whatever the theory, I’ll stick with my approach, I like it!
Comments(0)








